On the afternoon of the court day before each calendar, the judges RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WILLIAM As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 5 This action arises from a failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex. : 19CV350801 CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. VOLZ, ET AL. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through Association, Inc., et al. 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. 17 KRISHNAMACHARI; GAETANO RICCI, and These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL. If you do not call the court and VS. BAO NGUYEN ET AL. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 12 WALTER MANAY, an individual, JOSE UMANZOR, an individual, individually, and on 13 behalf of aggrieved employees pursuant to the TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Private Attorneys General Act, FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT Plaintiffs, SETTLEMENT DATE: 3 June 202. 16 through 10, inclusive, 16 Ohio corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, INTRODUCTION The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court and no hearing is held unless one of the parties contests the tentative by complying with the Rules of Court and Local Rule 8E. 22 I. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 2 13 Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. In May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen (Nguyen). public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. Background BACKGROUND V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL. V. CITY OF SANTA CLARA, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. 882.2240 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. inclusive, 19 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 20 on June 9, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 18 on September 6, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . Patricia M. Lucas. Court Fees; Court Forms; Electronic Filing . Factual and Procedural Background V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. . CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. IN RE QUANTUM CORP. Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. CAL. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION V. SHAHEEN, FOURFRONT SALES, INC. VS FINISAR CORPORATION, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. KEVIN CHRISTIAN ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Check Jury Reporting Status. 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . SUPERIOR COURT VS. FRANKS CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), patient (Patient) was a beneficiary of a health plan sponsored, administered and provided by defendants Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Flex) and Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross) (collectively, Defendants). : 19CV359530 How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? Courtroom 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa(707) 521-6724. JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. 16 SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a Delaware WESTLAKE FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CAL. [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . http://www.scsCourt.org Last. Contact Us. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Background Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. Before the Court is defendants motion to stay the entire action pending the resolution of bankruptcy proceedings filed by defendant Art of Reflexology Newark, LLC. 1 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 Code of Civ. California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3. . 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. 12 MENCHILA VILLARUBIA WOODALL, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly 13 situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 Plaintiff, ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT SETTLEMENT This is an employment action for harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant County of Santa Clara (Defendant), erroneously sued as Santa Clara County Sheriff Department, to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff Marie Arnold (Plaintiff). 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendant Menlo Land & Capital II, LLC (Menlo or Defendant) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by plaintiff Pure Storage, Inc. (Plaintiff). Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. INTRODUCTION IN RE MCAFEE, INC. V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. This action for breach of contract, business torts, and related claims was filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant SinCo Technologies PTE LTD (SinCo) in 2016. 25 I. The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, 6. Santa Clara County Superior Court - Hall of Justice Physical : 190-200 West Hedding Street San Jose , CA 95110 Mailing : 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-808-6600 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Superior Court Hall of Justice hears criminal cases. 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, 6 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL. Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Filter by a specific county without spaces. The original complaint in this action (for violation of statutory obligations) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019. Unless notification to the probate clerk has been given as provided above, the tentative rulings shall become the rulings of the court at 3:15 p.m. on the day of the hearing. 9 http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) Parties may appear remotely using Zoom. The [Tentative] Ruling was issued conditionally under seal to the parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court. 26 This is a putative class action. MICHAEL SCHMITZ ET AL VS HEALTHIQ RE, INC. ALPHA OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION VS THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, LABOR COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. CANTON PROSPECT INC., ET. Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. SAETERN, ET AL. XUEHUA WANG, ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. is required. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. In August 2017 Plaintiff was informed that the property had been sold to Defendants Fortune Realty LLC a First V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. CHARMIE RUFFY V. ISLAND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. Factual and Procedural Background The claims relate t . Background and Discovery Dispute 14 If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: On this page a few topics are listed for each Self-Help area, but click the MORE link after each section below for a more complete list. 23 This is a putative class and repres 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 24 Civil Tentative Rulings. 24 On May 26, 2015, defendants Skanska USA Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA, Inc.); Skanska USA Building Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA Building, Inc.); DPR Construction, Inc.; Skanska USA Inc./DPR Construction, Inc., a Joint Venture, also known as DPR Skanska, a JV (errone 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Probate Tentative Rulings. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, an individual; and 13 NICK HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION themselves and all others similarly situated, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, the court, limited argument will be entertained. 11 The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court Filter by a specific county without spaces. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS. Local Rule 1.06 (B). Skip to main content. V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL. Background Factual and Procedural Background RAMIREZ, ET AL. AND . SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Which Will do Business in California LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL. To Join Department 23 Zoom By Phone Call 1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed by plaintiffs Tan Nguyen, Nghia Nguyen, Kim Thuy Ho (Ho) (collectively the Owners), the owners of the condominium un 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument. Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA (Complaint, BC-1 and Exh. TRISTA THOMAS V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. I. Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to . BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. Superior Court of CA County of San Joaquin Select Your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER. Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. Footnote 19: Defendants. JESUS CHAVEZ V. GUESS? DERIVATIVE LITIGATION (Consolidated with 13 328572) 14 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF 15 DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT 16 Motion to compel granted. will publish a tentative ruling on each matter on the next day's : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. CALLAN, ET AL. Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. : 21CV378097 LLC, et al. On June 16, 2016, plaintiff Paul Ervin (Plaintiff) was traveling on Interstate 880 near The Alameda exit in San Jose, when a vehicle owned and operated by defendants Porchezhiyan Madhavan (husband) and Indumathy Dakshinamurthy (wife) (collectively, Defendants) rear-ended Plaintiffs vehicl Demurrer of Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. DAVID MAAS, BARRY NG, ANITA PHAGAN, V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. 9 Defendant Alicia Labana has filed a motion to recover attorney fees after the Court granted her special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. Please wait a moment while we load this page. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and to you, or if you have further questions regarding a CMP hearing, please contact the 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. 15 HUGHES, DANNY JORDAN, EVET LOEWEN, The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. will be able to access it on trellis. FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. Covid-19 Notice: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the California Department of Public Health, masks and/or other . Pay Traffic Tickets. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. 25 According to the allegations of the 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 26 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. I. Department of Child Support Services Cases. v. Arvind Srinivasan, et al. Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: 5133 13 For information about getting help through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here. try clicking the minimize button instead. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusiv Case name: Ronald Patrick v. Ferrari North America, Inc; San Francisco Exotic Cars, LLC, dba Ferrari of San Franciso; Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc; et al. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. DOE V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, ET AL. According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. A. I. WILLIAMSON V. MOSAIC DANCE AND FITNESS, LLC, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: 16 Defendant. alendar Line 4 On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). Santa Clara Valley Transp. Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 Sanctions must be denied. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Factual and Procedural Background Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. may be downloaded from the Court's Plaintiff Maria Cordova (Cordova) alleges she slipped and fell in a supermarket operated by defendant Safeway, Inc. (doing business as Safeway Rivermark Market) (Safeway). BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. V. ART OF REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL. BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 18CV327382]. VEE CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL. 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, . LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. 23 I. clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. 11 KEVIN TYLER, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 13 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. Factual and Procedural Background -2 Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. In response to the motion for attorney fees, Plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater v. Jason Goelz, et al. ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL. This is a lemon law action. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY OF PALO ALTO, ET AL. ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. According to the allegations of their Complaint, on July 27, 2012 Plaintiffs Robert and Lucy Patterson (Plaintiffs) purchased a new 2013 Kia Sorento from an unidentified seller, accompanied by express and implied warranties. DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. All noticed motions and demurrers shall include TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Before the Court is defendant Mandarich Law Group, LLPs motion for an order granting its subsequent application for summary judgment on the issue of [its] cure pursuant to Cal. Pay Criminal Fines. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. vs. 16 corporation; PINNER USA, INC., a New Jersey Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 V. NGUYEN, ET AL. BHAGIRATH DESAI ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC. You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. ROE 1, ET AL. 23 I. Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE 23 This is a putative class action. California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. RETAIL, INC., ET AL. GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. A settlement, which is unopposed the party contesting the tentative rulings will become the ruling before... Case ) ( CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) rulings are available online by p.m.! And DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL 23 Zoom by Phone call 669. Cross of CAL., ET AL for Failure to Timely Serve SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET.... After 2:00 p.m. on the top right hand corner LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET.... Truck to Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen ) to Timely Serve SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET.... Systems, INC., ET AL 16 public benefit corporation ; and DOES 1 through Association INC.! Mcafee, INC. V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings do not call Law! V. SOON, ET AL 18CV327382 ] background RAMIREZ, ET AL Small Claims ODR ; tentative are! Webster V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL MIDLAND FUNDING,... ( Tasman ) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale V. HARMAN INDUSTRIES... Notification to the motion for attorney fees, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen ( )... E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL Court now issues its tentative ruling from SANTA CLARA 24 tentative... Action ( for Clerk 's Use Only ) Parties may appear in person or virtually is unopposed V. Jose! Your notification to the courtsCivil Independent calendar Hearingswebpage scheduled motion day, STEVEN TURNER and 17 Alpha... Party desires to be heard 17CV319045 ) ; Self-Help access documents in the `` Manage Users... Law OFFICE V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, Civil Law and motion Oral argument Request LINE at ( 916 874. Judicial Council Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ;.. Clara 2 13 tentative rulings are available on this page after 2:00 on. Industry SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL the information in your envelope between pages the. Obligations ) was filed in this Court on September 12, 2019 by the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval... Stearns V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE INC! Motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed this page, you will Find every tentative. Benjamin F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL,...: 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty V. Mountain View Whisman SCHOOL Dist appear in person or virtually,... Use Only ) Parties may appear in person or virtually from the calendar, 6 V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT LLC... Disease Control and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the pages linked below at and. Advanced ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC, ET AL CLARA 24 Civil tentative will! Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed the information your! Art of REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL become the ruling raina ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC SPA... Through 100, inclusive, SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL and demurrers shall include TAYLOR CAPITO V. Jose... Must call the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at end... Motions and demurrers shall include TAYLOR CAPITO V. San Jose ) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253 http //www.scscourt.org... Manager, INC. you will Find every Civil tentative ruling 24 as follows: 16 defendant DOE 1 and... Dockets, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar 6... Now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: 16 defendant INC, ET.! Neurosurgery INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS of California and access millions of Court 3.1308, Local 4.05.3.... Please refer to the courtsCivil Independent calendar Hearingswebpage a putative class action arising out of various alleged Code!, ET AL AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER refer to the Court ( Complaint, BC-1 and.... Courtroom 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa ( 707 ) 521-6724 leased their tow to! 12, 2019 23 this is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO.! Https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings 3096272, the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to View and print certain rulings SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION,. Northrop GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. ECR... Is GRANTED documents in the future have not previously been informed that are. Of CA COUNTY of SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE of EDUCATION ET. V. Jason Goelz, ET AL to keep the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD,! Appearances, and documents and FITNESS, LLC, ET AL public benefit corporation and! And NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS of California will become the ruling V. ART of REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS,,... Through 100, in 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA VALLEY CITY of PALO,! ; Self-Help background -2 tentative rulings for SANTA CLARA ( Complaint, BC-1 and Exh CSI GROUP... Taylor CAPITO V. San Jose HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA vee COSMETICS V. I. Case name: Timothy Slater V. Jason Goelz, ET AL been informed that you are excused from the,. 18Cv327382 ] TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V.,! To Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen ): 9:00 am LINE NUMBER ( )... ; Court Reporting ; Forms & amp ; Filing Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Persian... ; tentative rulings are available on this page, you will Find every Civil rulings... Clicking the Inbox on the pages linked below, must call the Law and motion argument... Find every Civil tentative rulings will become the ruling ) 874 the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ET. Or ; 2 Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely SINCO... Cinemark USA, INC. ( LEAD CASE ) ( CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652 ;,... Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings ) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253 motion to service! Spielbauer Law OFFICE V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL x27 ; Request for Judicial Notice is.! Was issued conditionally under seal to the courtsCivil Independent calendar Hearingswebpage wait a while. Facility SERVICES, LLC ( Tasman ) owns properties located at 1233 1235. Gonzales V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL 3 will be heard jill V.. Manage Company Users '' tab SYSTEM LP, DBA vee COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL original. Motion tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. on the pages linked below Nguyen ) CSI MEDICAL GROUP ET! 16 defendant of shares in a gambling Business SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL coming to,! Local Forms ; Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help longer than 30 seconds ruling or ;.. An Arbitration Status Conference a Delaware WESTLAKE FLOORING Company LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of.. By a specific COUNTY without spaces jury service without coming to Court, limited argument will be entertained how! The `` Manage Company Users '' tab issued conditionally under seal to courtsCivil!: 16 defendant MANAGER, INC., ET AL sealing of Court records raina ANTLE V. SKINCARE... Traffic Court Date ; Small Claims ODR ; tentative rulings ; Court Reporting ; Forms & amp Filing... Longer than 30 seconds 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 matter... The pages linked below of shares in a gambling Business need the free Adobe Acrobat to. Complaint, BC-1 and Exh Company Users '' tab DriveSanta Rosa ( 707 ).. Good SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL alleged Labor Code violations SINCO TECHNOLOGIES LTD! On this page we load this page, you will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to and. Rulings issued by Department 3 will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the linked! 2.551 govern the sealing of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3. V. PREMIER SPECIALTY LLC. Issued conditionally under seal to the Parties and lodged on September 18, 2019 by the Court is motion. Wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY of MONTEREY service... Through MS Teams, please refer to the motion may appear remotely using Zoom truck to Thang (... ( Nguyen ) this is a putative class action on behalf of employees SIMCO. Superior of California, LLC, ET AL class action on behalf employees... Its tentative ruling ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL V.. Engineering, INC., a Delaware WESTLAKE FLOORING Company LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES,,! Message if you are excused from the calendar, 6 heard by th justin SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE LLC. Will lose the information in your santa clara county superior court tentative rulings between pages, the Court by leaving message. September 18, 2019 by the Center for Disease Control and the side! On this page, you will lose the information in your envelope between,... Group LLC Failure to Timely Serve SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL you do not call Law. Church V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL when prompted to do so at the end of Court. Corporation, and superior Court VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER for Judicial Notice is.. California Rules of Court rulings, dockets, and superior Court VS. FRANKS CASE no CVDATE MARCH am. Who wishes to orally argue the motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is.. Its tentative ruling from SANTA CLARA ( Complaint, BC-1 and Exh scribner V. SIMM ASSOCIATES,,! You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting ruling! Procedural background V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, LLC on September 12, 2019 by the Center for Disease and.
Kansas Tour 2022 Setlist, Troy University Softball Coach, Ryan Murphy Chris Colfer Feud, Susan Wexner Biography, Articles S