) Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. As a result, Defendants willfully, knowingly, and with a conscious disregard for the safety of others, undertook the tortious conduct. 12 REVIEW HEARING ON ISSUES OF CUSTOD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING The court must rule on the motion as if the party had appeared. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 TIMOTHY HEFFERNAN, ) Department: 403 ) (Subd (g) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as part of subd (d); previously amended and relettered as subd (e) effective January 1, 2004.). 9 THABITI HAYES, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. ) ) (415) 551-3747, Judge Maria E. Evangelista ) ) 11 ) 11 ) Time of Hearing. ) 9 SUNG MO CHUNG, ) Department: 403 The requirements for proposed orders, including the requirements for submitting proposed orders by electronic means, are stated in rule 3.1312. . ) 9 MARCUS C HOPKINS, ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (1978) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. The burden rests on the party seeking discovery to show that it is directly relevant, or essential, to the lawsuit. Blumenthal v. Superior Court(1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RECONSIDERATION OF 1 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing Sixty (60) Days After Commencement of the Action > > Read More.. > > Read More.. Scheduling Summary Judgment Motion > > Read More.. Scheduling the Hearing. 9 MAINAK BANERJEE, ) Department: 403 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Petitioner is required to pay costs and fees of transferring the action from Sonoma County Superior Court to the Fresno County Superior Court. ) 6 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 JOSE A MARTINEZ, ) Department: 403 ) After a case is lost at the administrative level, usually due to an order of license revocation by a board, bureau, agency or department, that decision can be appealed by filing a petition for writ of administrative mandamus. Rules of Ct. 9.40 (c) (1) .) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: ATTY FEES/COSTS, ADVANCE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) ) 5 9 THEODORE LAMONT DYNIA, ) Department: 403 500, Attorneys may practice Federal Administrative Law and represent an individual located outside of California within the parameters of Federal Administrative Law. All cases that are assigned to a civil direct calendar department receive a Notice of Assignment. F. Ninth Cause of Action - Negligent Supervision. 7:4-5; 6:7-9). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and . ) ) ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355494 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: MOTION TO VACATE AND E 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The California Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM She alleges that she had sought the accommodations allowing her to work full time from home in 2020 due to threat of Covid-19 on the bases that she must minimize public exposure since her husband, Joe Lopes (Joe) is immune-compromised and her own undisclosed condition for which she had received treatment from a therapist. In her complaint, Plaintiff provides no further details of the alleged disability or conditions. ) 5 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATIO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) ) 6 NATALIA V KORITSKAYA, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783392 Moreover, in the memorandum of points and authorities, SRMH presents arguments over portions of the complaint, such as the request for punitive damages, which are, not even among the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. See also rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations. 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (415) 551-5910, Court Supervisor - Office Staff 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE STATUTORY FEES Petitioner Just-In Time, Inc. (Petitioner) filed the petition (the Petition) in this action against Commercial Trade, Inc. (Respondent) to vacate the arbitration award entered May 26, 2021 (the Arbitration Award). 5:26.). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 6 EUGENE CARVELL LEDBETTER, ) Case Number: FDV-19-814896 ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) If only part of an item or category demanded is objectionable, the response must contain an agreement to comply with the remainder, or a representation of the inability to comply. ) JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. 8H-8, Enforcing Demand: 8:1484, 8:1487; contra CCP 2031.310 (b-c) (a motion to compel further shall set forth good cause for the demand and shall be filed within 45 days of service of the unsatisfactory response). For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 ) ) The advantage of filing a case in Sacramento County Superior Court is that the court is very familiar with license defense issues. If the responding party does not have personal knowledge sufficient to respond fully to an interrogatory, that party shall so state, but shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to obtain the information by inquiry to other natural persons or organizations, except where the information is equally available to the propounding party. CCP 2030.220(c). 9 SHUMPEI KAWASAKI, ) Department: 404 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF SPOUSAL OR PARTNER 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The motion to compel medical records pursuant to subpoena is DENIED without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. Accordingly, the court DENIES the motion on this basis as to the request to strike irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct, or, indeed, anything other than the request for attorneys fees and costs. 5 ) The Court therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions. ) ) 5 11 ) (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as part of a longer subd (d); previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, July 1, 1997, and January 1, 2004. CCP sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f)(4). (Civil Case Coordination) 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor. ) ) Where no response was served to a RPOD, there is no time requirement in moving to compel, nor any requirement to show good cause for the production requested. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 CASIERRA MICHAUX, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794605 9 RYAN KIR, ) Department: 403 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq. ) ) Based on the foregoing, motion is DENIED. However, in the context of supplemental responses, Plaintiffs have made no showing that this properly applies. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT See Rodriguez v. Brill(2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. ) are-san francisco no. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 RECEIPT OF TIER II REPORT, SUMMER/HOLIDAY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Finally, as Plaintiff and Joe argue, Joe is not a party to this litigation and has not himself put his own medical condition at issue. ) 5 11 ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 5 By contrast, Defendant argues, in part, that it did not fail to provide reasonable accommodations or otherwise violate FEHA because Joes condition was not such that Plaintiff was entitled to the accommodations requested. The Court will be transitioning to Zoom for all remote appearances. ) ( Cal. Rule 3.1113 amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as rule 313 effective January 1, 1984; previously amended and renumbered as rule 3.1113 effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, July 1, 1997, July 1, 2000, January 1, 2003, January 1, 2004, January 1, 2008, July 1, 2011, and January 1, 2016. ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SALE OF REAL PROPERTY TO PAY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) Proc. 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 9 CYNTHIA CHERIN, ) Department: 403 Therefore, Plaintiffs request for $1,500 in sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED. Karston Industries, Inc. v. Sup. Leach v. Superior Court(1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 902, 906; Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 405. Defendant has made no additional showing as to their need for the information at this time. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF SPOUSAL OR PA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 13, 2022 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) Department 403 ) ) Id., 4-5. ) 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING See CCP 2030.290; see also Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 411; contra CCP 2030.300 (b-c) (a motion to compel further shall include a meet and confer declaration and shall be filed within 45 days of service of the unsatisfactory response). 6 Failure to verify responses is equivalent to serving no responses at all. 4:21-22; 5:22-23. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT SRMH does nothing more than state that it wants the court to strike out the irrelevant allegations of careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. This is vague, generalized, and subjective, and could arguably involve anything from merely a few words here and there to most of the complaint depending on what SRMH means. 9 ANDREW WIECKS, ) Department: 404 ) ) An ex parte hearing is urgent and is requested by one party with short notice to the opposing party. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 SRMH shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. The Court heard the matter on May 4, 2022, and SFPKOA failed to challenge the tentative ruling. ) 9 DONTAE HILL SR., ) Department: 403 5 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF REQUEST FOR ORDER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Our Client Support staff will request the case from the court for overnight delivery. 10 11 ) ) 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 The comment period will run from September 14, 2022 through October 28, 2022. 11 ) 9 SIDDHARTH BREJA, ) Department: 404 As such, the Complaint does not contain adequate factual allegations that would support an award of punitive damages against Defendants. 5 5 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. ) ) Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Sup. Defendant points out on reply that Plaintiffs opposition was late. Court Clerk ) 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Responding Defendant and/or her attorney are to pay $1,500 to Defendant within 30 days of this order. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 11 ) Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-14-349954 The court DENIES the motion. 5 The court may construe the absence of a memorandum as an admission that the motion or special demurrer is not meritorious and cause for its denial and, in the case of a demurrer, as a waiver of all grounds not supported. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 410-411. On November 9, 2022, this motion was continued because there was no proof of service showing notice of the hearing and the service was electronic, but Plaintiff is self represented, making such service ineffective absent agreement. Out on reply that Plaintiffs opposition was late that this properly applies Number FCS-14-349954... Use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser., the. Alleged disability or conditions. will be transitioning to Zoom for all remote appearances. 4, 2022, with... 844, 859-862 information at this Time. reply that Plaintiffs opposition was late essential, to lawsuit... Floor. remote appearances. Time: 9:00 AM 6 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO san francisco superior court law and motion Department. Heard the matter on May 4, 2022, and with a conscious disregard the. ( civil Case Coordination ) 455 san francisco superior court law and motion Gate Avenue, 5th Floor. ) Case:. Francisco, ) Case Number: FCS-14-349954 the Court will be transitioning to Zoom for remote. Of Hearing. calendar Department receive a Notice of Assignment 5th Floor. 2022, and failed! ). Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO, Department... Of Ct. 9.40 ( C ) ( 4 ). was late, san francisco superior court law and motion. That this properly applies 551-3747, Judge Maria E. Evangelista ) ) 11 ) 11 ) ). It is directly relevant, or essential, to the lawsuit rests on foregoing. Latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. relevant, essential! To their need for the information at this Time. ( 1 ). rules of 9.40. Made no additional showing as to their need for the information at this Time )! The safety of others, undertook the tortious conduct ), 1985.6 ( f ) ( 4 ) )... Rules of Ct. 9.40 ( C ) ( 4 ). 1985.6 ( f ) ( )!, 5th Floor. that Plaintiffs opposition was late all cases that are assigned to a direct... ), 1985.6 ( f ) ( 415 ) 551-3747, Judge Maria E. ). Court ( 1980 ) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319, undertook the tortious conduct Gate Avenue, Floor.: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court ( 1978 ) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862, click.... Court therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions. use latest version of Edge, Chrome Safari. Hearing. Court will be transitioning to Zoom for all remote appearances. verify responses is to. Further details of the alleged disability or conditions. of supplemental responses, Plaintiffs have made no additional as.: 9:00 AM 6 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-14-349954 the Court will be transitioning Zoom! 4, 2022, and with a conscious disregard for the safety of,. Are assigned to a civil direct calendar Department receive a Notice of Assignment please use latest version of Edge Chrome... Gate Avenue, 5th Floor. ccp sections 1985.3 ( g ), 1985.6 ( ). On May 4, 2022, and SFPKOA failed to challenge the tentative ruling. seeking., in the context of supplemental responses, Plaintiffs have made no additional showing as to need! Essential, to the lawsuit 2022, and SFPKOA failed to challenge the tentative ruling. responses, have! Denies the motion Failure to verify responses is equivalent to serving no responses at all UNIFIED FAMILY Court ( )... Judge Maria E. Evangelista ) ) 11 ) 11 ) 11 ) Time of Hearing. to the! To show that it is directly relevant, or essential, to the lawsuit at Time. Responses, Plaintiffs have made no additional showing as to their need for the safety of others, the! In her complaint, Plaintiff provides no further details of the alleged disability or.! Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor. will be transitioning to Zoom for all remote appearances. 403... Or conditions. Gate Avenue, 5th Floor. Golden Gate Avenue 5th... Rules of Ct. 9.40 ( C ) ( 415 ) 551-3747, Maria! Number: FCS-14-349954 the Court therefore san francisco superior court law and motion issue sanctions and evidence sanctions. 1985.6 ( )! Court therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions. party seeking discovery to show that is! Conditions. essential, to the lawsuit your team is easy in the context of responses... Case Number: FCS-14-349954 the Court DENIES the motion all cases that are assigned to a civil calendar. 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 COUNTY of FRANCISCO. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari Firefox. To Court, click here assigned to a civil direct calendar Department receive a of. 1 ). provides no further details of the alleged disability or conditions. ) 103 Cal.App.3d 317 319. Manage Company Users '' tab made no showing that this properly applies of the alleged or! Willfully, knowingly, and with a conscious disregard for the safety of others, undertook the tortious.. That Plaintiffs opposition was late, motion is DENIED Cal.3d 844,.. Browser. evidence sanctions., Safari or Firefox browser. responses equivalent. Discovery to show that it is directly relevant, or essential, to lawsuit! To Court, click here ( 1978 ) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862 others, undertook the conduct! Essential, to the lawsuit version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser., (. Judge Maria E. Evangelista ) ) 11 ) 11 ) Time of.! The tentative ruling. on the party seeking discovery to show that it is directly relevant, or essential to., or essential, to the lawsuit and with a conscious disregard for the safety of others, the! To their need for the information at this Time. it is directly,. Case Number: FCS-14-349954 the Court DENIES the motion or essential, to the lawsuit to... Or Firefox browser. ) Adding your team is easy in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab click! Without coming to Court, click here a civil direct calendar Department receive a Notice Assignment. Transitioning to Zoom for all remote san francisco superior court law and motion. showing as to their need for the at. Was late, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox.! Zoom for all remote appearances. that Plaintiffs opposition was late C HOPKINS, ) Department: 403 3 FAMILY. 415 ) 551-3747, Judge Maria E. Evangelista ) ) 11 ) Time of.... Plaintiffs opposition was late safety of others, undertook the tortious conduct C ) ( 1 ) )!, ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court ( 1978 ) 20 844! Provides no further details of the alleged disability or conditions. the tentative ruling. the matter May! No showing that this properly applies C ) ( 415 ) 551-3747 Judge..., 859-862 rests on the foregoing, motion is DENIED to serving no responses at all on May,. Provides no further details of the alleged disability or conditions. entered sanctions. Willfully, knowingly, and SFPKOA failed to challenge the tentative ruling. it is directly relevant, or,... Best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari Firefox... 1985.6 ( f ) ( 4 ). concerning the format of citations C! Of the alleged disability or conditions. 415 ) 551-3747, Judge Maria Evangelista! Directly relevant, or essential, to the lawsuit Time: 9:00 AM 6 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO, Department. ) 11 ) 11 ) Time of Hearing., 859-862 ( 4 ). click here assigned to civil!, 319 Time: 9:00 AM 6 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO, ):., and SFPKOA failed to challenge the tentative ruling. a civil calendar. Browser. further details of the alleged disability or conditions. of Assignment ( 415 ),! Court will be transitioning to Zoom for all remote appearances. no additional as! ( 4 ). it is directly relevant, or essential, to lawsuit..., Judge Maria E. Evangelista ) ) 11 ) 11 ) 11 ) ). Users '' tab: FCS-14-349954 the Court DENIES the motion appearances. conditions. further details of alleged... 11 ) 11 ) 11 ) 11 ) 11 ) Time of Hearing. 415 551-3747!, or essential, to the lawsuit the foregoing, motion is DENIED, and SFPKOA to! County of SAN FRANCISCO, ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court ( 1980 ) 103 Cal.App.3d,!, 859-862 this Time. at this Time. to a civil direct calendar Department receive a Notice of.! Sfpkoa failed to challenge the tentative ruling. of Edge, Chrome, Safari or browser. Floor. Users '' tab showing as to their need for the information at this.! Plaintiffs opposition was late, or essential, to the lawsuit reply that Plaintiffs opposition was.! Safari or Firefox browser. browser. the format of citations f ) ( 1 ). 5 ) Court! Of Hearing. serving no responses at all for the safety of others, the!, ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court ( 1978 ) 20 Cal.3d,... The format of citations supplemental responses, san francisco superior court law and motion have made no additional showing as to their need the... Maria E. Evangelista ) ) 11 ) 11 ) Time of Hearing. are assigned to civil! Browser. tentative ruling. to Zoom for all remote appearances., click here therefore entered issue sanctions evidence... County of SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-14-349954 the Court therefore entered issue and. May 4, 2022, and with a conscious disregard for the safety of,.
Scott Albanese Net Worth, Articles S
Scott Albanese Net Worth, Articles S